On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:06:47AM -0700, David Conrad wrote: > > What am I missing?
>From my POV, nothing. Paul seemed to be suggesting that the current arrangements should be published somehow other than as "an IETF document". Maybe he meant "send it up the Independent Submissions editor with ICANN staff on the top". I don't really know. If that is what he meant, then I think the distinction is not that interesting. IME nobody except a tiny fraction of IETF participants makes the ISE/IETF product distinction. If it's not what he meant, then I see no value in creating a new publication path. IMO, what is current practice, whatever it is, ought to be in the document. A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
