FWIW I think the document should go ahead, with pretty minor edit about the current practice/should stuff. I think it was good to author a document on whats currently done even if people want other things done.
(I don't mean my other things, I mean other peoples other things. one does not refer to oneself in the third person unless mad) -G On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Richard Lamb <richard.l...@icann.org> wrote: > Sheesh..I thought we were talking about engineering issues. > > > > Speaking only as the humble engineer who helped develop the publication > methods and wrote the software that generates all the pieces, the most > recent draft does describe what my programs, scripts, and other pieces do. > If there is any technical variance, please let me know I don’t pretend to > be perfect. I run another copy of some of the pieces on my KSK rollover > test setup now, so id like to know. > > > > I have no opinion regarding the more abstract discussion regarding where > such a description belongs and look to learn from those better versed in > that subject. > > > > -Rick > > > > > > > > *From:* DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *George > Michaelson > *Sent:* Monday, October 5, 2015 8:07 AM > *To:* Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> > *Cc:* dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>; Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> > *Subject:* Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: > <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt> > > > > If its on the internet, its not out of band. > > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: > > > > On 5 Oct 2015, at 10:42, George Michaelson wrote: > > > Something very left field for me, but I believe important, is that we > need > > to also publish the out-of-band publication point of the trust material. > > This draft is exclusively concerned with publishing trust anchors > out-of-band of the protocol. > > > I mentioned this to Joe some time ago and was very correctly told "out of > > scope" but I believe its nonsensical to exclude physical publication, eg > in > > newspapers of record for at least 3 economies worldwide, of the hash of > the > > public key as a standing event. > > This draft aims to document current practice. To my knowledge, nobody has > ever published a trust anchor (or even a pointer to it) in print media. > > > In-band only has some issues for me, if we are talking about trust. > > Me too, hence the decision by ICANN to publish trust anchors using > out-of-band mechanisms in 2009/2010, as this draft aims to document. > > > Joe > > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
