> > Absolutely not (recommend ISPs should delegate). While it would be good > > if an ISP offered this to interested parties, don't expect to saddle the > > operator with yet another service that expects the customer to > > reply/provide out-of-band information. > > The point of delegating is is that in most cases the customer won't populate > it, and in the cases where they want to, it is now their problem, not the > ISP's problem. So Paul gets his "I am a luser" signal, and I get my PTR tree. > All nodes are not equal on the Internet, but that should be by choice, not by > design. Putting my ISP hat on:
- Our business customers can already have reverse zones delegated if they ask. - For our residential customers, should we be expected to delegate lots of reverse zones that mostly wouldn't be populated? I can easily see how this could lead to extra calls to customer support, extra logging of failures on name servers, etc. In short, most likely extra cost. Since residential service is a very low margin game, anything which adds to the cost of providing the service is a non-starter. Not gonna happen. Steinar Haug, AS 2116 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
