On 5/13/15, 11:05 AM, "Paul Wouters" <p...@nohats.ca> wrote:
>On Wed, 13 May 2015, Lee Howard wrote: > >> Is there consensus now that ISPs don¹t need to provide PTRs for their >>customers? > >No. > >As long as the anti-spam meassures include refusing email from IPv6 >without PTR's, such a consensus would mean taking the ability away from >people running their own mail servers with IPv6 on ISP controlled IPv6. > >Without the PTRs, sadly those IPv6 addresses are not equal peers on the >internet, but only marginally better than a NATed IPv4 address. I would contend that those IPv6 addresses are NOT equal peers, for the sake of SMTP. But just because I disagree with you doesn¹t mean I won¹t count your opinion. Lee > >Paul > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
