FWIW, I agree w/ Paul and Ted. Customer should have the option to fill in reverse IPv6 tree. Arent we headed toward a society where we all become content providers with "the cloud" just a recurring fad? -Rick
-----Original Message----- From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lee Howard Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 8:35 AM To: Tony Finch Cc: dnsop@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DNSOP] relax the requirement for PTR records? On 5/13/15, 11:12 AM, "Tony Finch" <d...@dotat.at> wrote: >Lee Howard <l...@asgard.org> wrote: >> >> Is there consensus now that ISPs don't need to provide PTRs for their >> customers? > >ISPs should delegate the relevant part of the IPv6 reverse DNS tree to >the customer, so the customer can provision PTR records as required. This is already addressed in the draft. draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07 section 2.3.3 and 2.4, and in the recommendations. Lee > >Tony. >-- >f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ >Biscay: West or southwest 4 or 5, increasing 6 or 7. Moderate, becoming >rough later. Rain or showers. Moderate or good. > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
