In homenet we discussed how the CPE can outsource the reverse zone to a third party. This means that we considered the reverse zone generation could be delegated to each customer by the ISP.
BR, Daniel -----Original Message----- From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 11:19 AM To: Tony Finch Cc: Lee Howard; dnsop@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DNSOP] relax the requirement for PTR records? On May 13, 2015, at 11:12 AM, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > ISPs should delegate the relevant part of the IPv6 reverse DNS tree to > the customer, so the customer can provision PTR records as required. Yes, this is what we should recommend. I don't expect all ISPs to do this, but it's the right thing to do on a technical level, unless we want to deprecate PTR records. The idea that this shouldn't happen goes against the notion of end-to-end service on the internet: it presumes that "providers" are not "end users," and while this is a prevalent business model at the moment, I don't think it's a business model the IETF should be favoring (or, to be clear, that we should be discouraging either). _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
