-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 03/17/15 18:28, David Conrad wrote:
> 
> What benefit does tying a bunch of unrelated strings together bring
> in arguing for Special Name status?
> 
*** I know you already replied that you already commented the P2PNames
draft, but frankly my response should be pasting the whole Introduction
of it here, because you don't seem to have read it at all.  Maybe you
would like to comment on it, instead of saying those strings are unrelated.

==
hk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVCJ6LXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0
ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg90CYQAJKPWSIJQqihmNrdm/YRSPP+
ITqXAHP/mNNqBj1vtTq+By+Xz0VCC4dl1na0TdfztvN/ehPaXBgrnAKyrGm7cq5i
Y43S9Rw8aeUN9hWXrHUFl1HoOFB1rdFJODMs6pO0VyjLzlvjBRGCQNEJjmbRJ1wZ
ayvVDMBaRawk+Q3skyI5SbFyGORPIQNVpLII/B/oKsrJ/XnL6ggAn0PYqXbfCYYt
Rxen5RkPRH28nkqR0amvuaq8Xe8EI4iGUCjmRu8Y83HTAmgAZTimjHSPFvSbpqzY
izkFcdMsf9l5Tqyu++y5tWZUU7EvS+Fn85A4bb+C7C6wJWb0tK0VuVEF9AZMtlqN
N471MIUk0UJPARwVzWljg+e8YlYiRfPvdkiKEYWFq57Wdt/z6dHzUHzFwgPOG14m
UvY5H2RX10KtbHzB+q+Bajlf71GcCT55gJqemcxFhnK72mYkyQX6m6Qnc1ZTUIcq
5MBojT/ENSGWqJdNxe6kapoRMKXg1/L3oJA1jF/elK8S58D4ZIHiXEFxZKjiHatk
qjNc7f0ChAqsPnEV5GkI1n2yDmULVLVmVIAMPAMclDLr4oiSahWqRoFo7KsA5/TO
4ewZ9vcAlMwUzMLy6qP0MzA+u2O5TGeR8O0tKjH3Q4WFFBbbz4ROF7dD7LZez/qt
84Sc5yw/dt4HwgEhcWcQ
=vmzh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to