-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/17/15 18:28, David Conrad wrote: > > What benefit does tying a bunch of unrelated strings together bring > in arguing for Special Name status? > *** I know you already replied that you already commented the P2PNames draft, but frankly my response should be pasting the whole Introduction of it here, because you don't seem to have read it at all. Maybe you would like to comment on it, instead of saying those strings are unrelated.
== hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVCJ6LXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg90CYQAJKPWSIJQqihmNrdm/YRSPP+ ITqXAHP/mNNqBj1vtTq+By+Xz0VCC4dl1na0TdfztvN/ehPaXBgrnAKyrGm7cq5i Y43S9Rw8aeUN9hWXrHUFl1HoOFB1rdFJODMs6pO0VyjLzlvjBRGCQNEJjmbRJ1wZ ayvVDMBaRawk+Q3skyI5SbFyGORPIQNVpLII/B/oKsrJ/XnL6ggAn0PYqXbfCYYt Rxen5RkPRH28nkqR0amvuaq8Xe8EI4iGUCjmRu8Y83HTAmgAZTimjHSPFvSbpqzY izkFcdMsf9l5Tqyu++y5tWZUU7EvS+Fn85A4bb+C7C6wJWb0tK0VuVEF9AZMtlqN N471MIUk0UJPARwVzWljg+e8YlYiRfPvdkiKEYWFq57Wdt/z6dHzUHzFwgPOG14m UvY5H2RX10KtbHzB+q+Bajlf71GcCT55gJqemcxFhnK72mYkyQX6m6Qnc1ZTUIcq 5MBojT/ENSGWqJdNxe6kapoRMKXg1/L3oJA1jF/elK8S58D4ZIHiXEFxZKjiHatk qjNc7f0ChAqsPnEV5GkI1n2yDmULVLVmVIAMPAMclDLr4oiSahWqRoFo7KsA5/TO 4ewZ9vcAlMwUzMLy6qP0MzA+u2O5TGeR8O0tKjH3Q4WFFBbbz4ROF7dD7LZez/qt 84Sc5yw/dt4HwgEhcWcQ =vmzh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop