> On Mar 17, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Alec Muffett <al...@fb.com > <mailto:al...@fb.com>> wrote: > > Hi Rubens! > > On 3/17/15, 6:34 PM, "Rubens Kuhl" <rube...@nic.br <mailto:rube...@nic.br>> > wrote: > >>> >> And where in this ballot is there a need for explicit reserving of >> .onion, since CAs already know they shouldn't try using DNS in the >> process of verifying a .onion certificate ? > > If I correctly understand the direction of your question, that is, in > fact, why this document is here for consideration. > > Consideration by DNSOP is relevant to taking forward the matter of putting > “.onion” into the special use domains registry, per the previous e-mail by > Richard Barnes, as viewable at: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg13765.html > <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg13765.html>
.onion was already under consideration under other drafts, but now there is a request specifically for .onion alleging time sensitiveness. But on the TLD-level, the only possibility of it becoming a response different from NXDOMAIN is a possible new gTLD round, something that is many years in the future... so the point for a .onion-specific work instead of it becoming part of a larger effort still escapes me. Rubens
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
