-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/17/15 19:10, Ted Lemon wrote: > > The problem is that there is more than one such string, and consensus depends on > the least popular string listed. > *** RFC 6761 reserves multiple in-addr.arpa. domains, example under three TLDs, plus .test., .invalid., and .localhost.. I certainly hope that was because it made technical sense, and not because of their popularity--you used that word a lot, but its technical meaning still escapes me.
> > So please stop arguing that draft-appelbaum-- should be dropped in favor of > draft-grothoff--. > *** If there is anything in what I wrote that made you think I did so, I apologize. I certainly consider having done that draft independently of ongoing work was a mistake, but I also argued in favor of pursuing a focused discussion, did I not? == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVCKrDXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9amYP/R/4bSzQuu70NTtL0oVgeCbf ITorB6+nHGFg8onq2H+83iOC0D2Cj5hXglK8BUX/Cj32w0uS0gCtbxeSjR/ET0LX 0p4Ws+nWz0HtZVOKs/R2Q/uy+2AhkFYMWAdOtxA0D4np0CmTAkmo7K0szDV1Rcvj or3tnnyhlSQkcvWBFxB8KY+c5a8IE1QAtTR1dJeh/1s9BkeTqwI8GtOLzlbTmI6x oeQrUbP9h+P442NoN6J7/ed307VaQLh6s5nKM2guij4yQrysRLHkpZndB8wS3lhL UOZ9lRxAR9eoPB+VQtwjlc2nv6Xyf3bJ9QpDZX7vEQcnBoiqO+6ZDX+7SwBFSPwF 7DQpg5W10g4J4m2f/kbyR6dS4b2GprUZ+vateHfXC2IYmmk19h7vTRK7i8LIRv9Q o2tkXII/pZHUHDW4JX/g+GoLbSHsAokHCQDS/6ItguZoAsbDvO6u77vO0OHqzw4k Ds9ailC59Luijp3X9OMG/nFW0ZX5LIaTGcLHjIp/thY+U8sahRtUSDQxr+AitWZ+ +1UWJrB2ofNNiN47I6l9lH3FXN3YpUg2TEeWJi7SZWbsUmxwA1PYrWDhQKAsgyq/ lk4vqukDz5AImTTs8tGaHeaM4am1fr9rw8BardbCWV0uGGyzSiGu+WQ6fUIKCUVw TgaD1Fli+O7TuYOJShXw =Y54k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
