-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/23/15 10:31, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > if somehow the onion name leaked and ended up in the DNS, it's not a > big deal > *** Well, although you're right as far as *applications* are concerned, this is still a big deal because humans are using these appplications, and that's the prime interest of having such a TLD reserved in the first place, that the DNS does not propagate any leak. So I agree with your amendment, but not with the "not a big deal" statement, which completely ignores the fundamental privacy implications of such leaks to the DNS.
== hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVEejFXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg91bEP/j112GQesXFel7AOtPEV++jo gtTA2k8maagKs5hjJTpw9dq7Oi0U1CEKTq8ZSoizIoQTAmgtMUZZNnRqOE6Tszhu VhMnhBP9xC75nEHrjQQOZC8A/mmOxTnSDkxX5/46wTP+4CVQ9ZbjLhVTHClf3ipf wZpqwCsmC8h0lvefw663jbEtU0wnOX+e1JnzKN8Snsoap/989uYBVfCzD9Xrykld 3MTGLgMiPmv1qqejPeM+yqqoqeL/VxeQDXsaHi40HUnDQDQCGQNXqboSKPbEuUg3 VxLMEqPKXd762RRsWQznDqG23H1S/DY59FG+U4GQ0AzcS5FYxM4Moito/WW2LLk6 JLDXFQt0XcW5OMZbxhz6LuZwzpVCkCNf6wnEcLT7CQFDCKs0O0K8sg61PNeOKwyP Ps0igpjuJ1hfjZIX8iEI6QoG9ktnY0tVtqw1k7aA4lRcuU8nxyflGANPwtE8KDTt pUGFOXjL5hH0iC+ufv1pmNJCSvKhSprifvb+hMPZt3gksJeJYO62RqrZR7dXl4HU CXO1FvNuCIoqhjZ/8n86JBLjpZ69TPq7zchJ2OFAeW7TY10/FSHqLrTiMFWyOJ6l XyHbg6mU2Av5osSKVMzQNZhY3HaOnrnlpOrn4Tv58si/M8pMK+VE1lxfgDcnV9dH mOEcz8LrmOB67pC0Dl5o =E7vq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
