dnsmasq-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Code dump. Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Code dump. Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] GCC-15, C23 compatibility and -Wincompatible-pointer-types errors gen2dev--- via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] GCC-15, C23 compatibility and -Wincompatible-pointer-types errors Simon Kelley
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] BUG Segfault when adding ethers entry via dBus and no dhcp-range is configured - debian version 2.89-1 Lou Lecrivain via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] BUG Segfault when adding ethers entry via dBus and no dhcp-range is configured - debian version 2.89-1 jay
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] BUG Segfault when adding ethers entry via dBus and no dhcp-range is configured - debian version 2.89-1 Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] BUG Segfault when adding ethers entry via dBus and no dhcp-range is configured - debian version 2.89-1 Lou Lecrivain via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] BUG Segfault when adding ethers entry via dBus and no dhcp-range is configured - debian version 2.89-1 Lou Lecrivain via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] About hostname with hyphens Ercolino de Spiacico
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About hostname with hyphens Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About hostname with hyphens Reynir Björnsson
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dhcp-host option: error out on multiple host names Reynir Björnsson
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dhcp-host option: error out on multiple host names Ercolino de Spiacico
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About hostname with hyphens Reynir Björnsson
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dhcp-host option: error out on multiple host names Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dhcp-host option: error out on multiple host names Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dhcp-host option: error out on multiple host names Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dhcp-host option: error out on multiple host names Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dhcp-host option: error out on multiple host names Simon Kelley
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq server support rotation/randomisation roboticwars
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq server support rotation/randomisation Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] trouble with host resolution Bernd Prager
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] trouble with host resolution Bernd Prager
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] trouble with host resolution Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request for a new release Jay Faulkner
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request for a new release Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request for a new release Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request for a new release Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request for a new release Sven Geuer
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request for a new release Sven Geuer
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request for a new release Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Request for a new release Brian Haley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patches Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock Ercolino de Spiacico
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock imnozi
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock Leonid Evdokimov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock Chris Green
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock Ercolino de Spiacico
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock Donald Muller
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock Ercolino de Spiacico
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] About resolution performance and adblock Ercolino de Spiacico
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Multiple dhcp-host with the same hostname -> multiple IPs in DNS? Glen Huang
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Removed empty trailing lines Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Removed empty trailing lines Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Removed empty trailing lines Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Removed empty trailing lines Sven Geuer
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Removed empty trailing lines Geert Stappers
• Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq-discuss Digest, Vol 234, Issue 2 Paul Kelly
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSmasq will not start, failed (Result: protocol) Paul Kelly
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSmasq will not start, failed (Result: protocol) Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSmasq will not start, failed (Result: protocol) Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to prevent Network Manager changing /etc/resolv.conf so dnsmasq doesn't cache? Chris Green
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to prevent Network Manager changing /etc/resolv.conf so dnsmasq doesn't cache? David Kronenwetter via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to prevent Network Manager changing /etc/resolv.conf so dnsmasq doesn't cache? Chris Green
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to prevent Network Manager changing /etc/resolv.conf so dnsmasq doesn't cache? Sven Geuer
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to prevent Network Manager changing /etc/resolv.conf so dnsmasq doesn't cache? Chris Green
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSmasq issue Shwetha via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSmasq issue Monthly Posting
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq running Shwetha via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host ipv6 not get assigned yet ipv4 does Glen Huang
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host ipv6 not get assigned yet ipv4 does Glen Huang
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host ipv6 not get assigned yet ipv4 does Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host ipv6 not get assigned yet ipv4 does Glen Huang
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host ipv6 not get assigned yet ipv4 does Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host ipv6 not get assigned yet ipv4 does Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host ipv6 not get assigned yet ipv4 does Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Bug? no-negcache set but still instant status:REFUSE w/ EDE: 23 (Network Error). mo via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Bug? no-negcache set but still instant status:REFUSE w/ EDE: 23 (Network Error). mo via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Bug? no-negcache set but still instant status:REFUSE w/ EDE: 23 (Network Error). Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Possible to enable DNSSEC only for specific upstream servers? Kevin P. Fleming
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Possible to enable DNSSEC only for specific upstream servers? wkitty42
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Possible to enable DNSSEC only for specific upstream servers? Kevin P. Fleming
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] NS record Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers Roger Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers after chain extension Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers after chain extension Roger Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers after chain extension Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers Roger Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers Roger Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 0/6] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 6/6] Use ChaCha8-based {rand16, rand32, rand64} Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/6] Fix -Wshadow: rand64() was mistakenly using its own counter O_o Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 2/6] Make in128++ branchless in SURF rand() Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 4/6] Rekey PRNG on fork() to avoid sharing PRNG state and/or leaking it Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 5/6] Reseed with getentropy() ~hourly to avoid low-entropy on boot Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 3/6] Use getentropy() if possible to reduce code duplication a bit Leonid Evdokimov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Leonid Evdokimov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Leonid Evdokimov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] socket activation support (systemd) kuehn.michael--- via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] socket activation support (systemd) Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] socket activation support (systemd) Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Rahul Thakur via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Geert Stappers
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Rahul Thakur via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Rahul Thakur via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Niels Hendriks
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Simon Kelley
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS resolving error White, Phil via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS resolving error Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Rahul Thakur via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Rahul Thakur via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Simon Kelley
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq 2.47 introduced a work-around for errant Windows behaviour, in that it did not assign IP addresses ending in .255 or .0 within the class c range even when using supernetting. 15 years on, the Windows versions that were broken in this way have reached end of support, and so we can now swing these addresses into use. Jan Ceuleers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq 2.47 introduced a work-around for errant Windows behaviour, in that it did not assign IP addresses ending in .255 or .0 within the class c range even when using supernetting. 15 years on, the Windows versions that were broken in this way have reached end of support, and so we can now swing these addresses into use. Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq 2.47 introduced a work-around for errant Windows behaviour, in that it did not assign IP addresses ending in .255 or .0 within the class c range even when using supernetting. 15 years on, the Windows versions that were broken in this way have reached end of support, and so we can now swing these addresses into use. Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq 2.47 introduced a work-around for errant Windows behaviour, in that it did not assign IP addresses ending in .255 or .0 within the class c range even when using supernetting. 15 years on, the Windows versions that were broken in this way have reached end of support, and so we can now swing these addresses into use. Geert Stappers
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dhcp.c: Updated comment lines Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq 2.47 introduced a work-around for errant Windows behaviour, in that it did not assign IP addresses ending in .255 or .0 within the class c range even when using supernetting. 15 years on, the Windows versions that were broken in this way have reached end of support, and so we can now swing these addresses into use. Petr Menšík
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question on dnsmasq code, which may occur a bad-free 胡义臻
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question on dnsmasq code, tests Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question on dnsmasq code, tests Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Regarding dnsmasq 胡义臻
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question on dnsmasq code, which may occur a bad-free Simon Kelley
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] Welcome back and waiting patches Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] and waiting patches Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Jan Ceuleers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Jan Ceuleers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Wink Saville
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Wink Saville
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Jan Ceuleers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Jan Ceuleers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot Shrenik Bhura
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Monthly Posting, September edition Monthly Posting
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Regression in 2.90 when addn-hosts has an IPv4 but not an IPv6 address Casey Tucker via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Regression in 2.90 when addn-hosts has an IPv4 but not an IPv6 address Sven Geuer
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Regression in 2.90 when addn-hosts has an IPv4 but not an IPv6 address Casey Tucker via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Dimitry Andric
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Dimitry Andric
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container at 9:10 Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container 0zl
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Danil Smirnov
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] issue when combined using addn-hosts= and nftset= sam
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Corey Minyard
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns imnozi
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Corey Minyard
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Corey Minyard
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Corey Minyard
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns list-dnsmasq-discuss--- via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Corey Minyard
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Alex Malinovich via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] CNAME not resolving for external domain Alex Malinovich via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] CNAME not resolving for external domain Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Example for connmark based iltering Uwe Schindler
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Example for connmark based filtering Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Example for connmark based filtering Uwe Schindler
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Loganaden Velvindron
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 wkitty42
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Loganaden Velvindron
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Gary R. Schmidt via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Peter van Dijk
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Gary R. Schmidt via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Add IANA Root TA 2024. Geert Stappers
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] trust-anchors.conf: nitpicking Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Loganaden Velvindron
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] all-servers option not working for dnssec-query queries Niels Hendriks
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] all-servers option not working for dnssec-query queries Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Klaus Vink Slott via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Klaus Vink Slott via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Klaus Vink Slott via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] ipset skbinfo support feature Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] A segmentation fault occurred in dnsmasq renmingshuai via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] A segmentation fault occurred in dnsmasq renmingshuai via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] A segmentation fault occurred in dnsmasq renmingshuai via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] A segmentation fault occurred in dnsmasq Geert Stappers

• Earlier messages
• Later messages