Hello Simon, On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 12:07:25AM +0000, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 1/18/25 21:56, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Anyhow, I'll investigate how to update dnsmasq on my OpenWrt machine > > with your patch and report back. > > Thanks. I did some more testing and found a couple more bugs. One is > theoretical and one is real in the sense that I saw it happen, but it > requires the forwarder part of dnsmasq to be configured with > > --cache-rr=ANY, > > so you probably haven't hit it. Anyway, I tagged 2.91test8, so best to test > that.
OK I did, and I see an improvement, namely:
root@happy:~# dig +dnssec kk4.kleine-koenig.org DS
; <<>> DiG 9.20.4 <<>> +dnssec kk4.kleine-koenig.org DS
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 45505
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 8, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 1232
; EDE: 29: (Result from negative cache for entire name)
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;kk4.kleine-koenig.org. IN DS
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
kleine-koenig.org. 2295 IN SOA ns2.kleine-koenig.org.
hostmaster.kleine-koenig.org. 1736985600 86400 7200 3600000 3600
2h1ek1sl5f0n5g07dos4u229nlrldiuh.kleine-koenig.org. 2295 IN NSEC3 1 0 0
- 2P9C6ENEEA87649H171LI9VRHSJHD415 A NS SOA MX TXT AAAA RRSIG DNSKEY NSEC3PARAM
CDS CDNSKEY SPF CAA
jsj8simjbajncnrcii8eq3474hg5f6pt.kleine-koenig.org. 2295 IN NSEC3 1 0 0
- KC9F61PEEQM0I99JMFUTDS2AG9ERP4JA CNAME RRSIG
b862q755o9ujc0mu6llpi5hu4n0tm9em.kleine-koenig.org. 2295 IN NSEC3 1 0 0
- BI486GC6KIU7IU4NLOCN8SL91BHSKRV5 A AAAA RRSIG
kleine-koenig.org. 2295 IN RRSIG SOA 13 2 86400
20250130000000 20250109000000 34607 kleine-koenig.org.
o+4F0Nhr6KWw6dEVfgeGRv4B3n1yjdZKhTCPB03IIK9naZQGvdgUfLV2
PADPEFYtDKv9ePRzyJTxobF+pCa2rA==
2h1ek1sl5f0n5g07dos4u229nlrldiuh.kleine-koenig.org. 2295 IN RRSIG NSEC3
13 3 3600 20250130000000 20250109000000 34607 kleine-koenig.org.
5d5BQRag1NrEKo22RhuvvqUBIq1NJykKUIwZGrzlvmRtvEUwl0VtciHf
6DnomyWFZqx5HIbuhTeOMu9CxdUjTg==
jsj8simjbajncnrcii8eq3474hg5f6pt.kleine-koenig.org. 2295 IN RRSIG NSEC3
13 3 3600 20250130000000 20250109000000 34607 kleine-koenig.org.
NzUYWmFm4OhGVMMU6DFFnB+xxzxA8ZOQZkSPXxT6yEaiXVvP4bXziolM
8o/2l0lcGO1j8ARAsVl4feDEfkY09A==
b862q755o9ujc0mu6llpi5hu4n0tm9em.kleine-koenig.org. 2295 IN RRSIG NSEC3
13 3 3600 20250130000000 20250109000000 34607 kleine-koenig.org.
Sx2J6xvVOFULEK6uKDMvP+E3gqJ251Dv2rAkLW+w/b/Fokp7Kg8t/oit
ZtDSi8InKqXfdiSUzLqWft9sjv2sXA==
;; Query time: 40 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Sun Jan 19 16:53:06 CET 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 848
(which lacked the DNSSEC stuff before).
*But* the SOA line mentioned there is the public one, which means that
that
server=/kleine-koenig.org/192.168.128.3
was ignored here?! (It works when asking directly for the SOA:
root@happy:~# dig kleine-koenig.org SOA
; <<>> DiG 9.20.4 <<>> kleine-koenig.org SOA
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 54931
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;kleine-koenig.org. IN SOA
;; ANSWER SECTION:
kleine-koenig.org. 3496 IN SOA ns1.kleine-koenig.org.
hostmaster.kleine-koenig.org. 1736985600 86400 7200 3600000 3600
;; Query time: 30 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Sun Jan 19 17:27:26 CET 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 97
(note ns1.kleine-koenig.org for internal vs. ns2.kleine-koenig.org for
external).
> The NS record is fine. It does get answered from the --auth-server param and
> a client should get the same answer from either the parent zone's auth
> server or the child zone's as long as both have been configured the same.
> It's in the unsigned child zone, so DNSSEC RRs don't apply.
However I cannot confirm that: As in the first mail reported I don't get
any answer when asking for the NS record from the forwarder:
root@happy:~# dig kk4.kleine-koenig.org NS
; <<>> DiG 9.20.4 <<>> kk4.kleine-koenig.org NS
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 19436
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;kk4.kleine-koenig.org. IN NS
;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Sun Jan 19 16:54:52 CET 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 50
dnsmasq logs the follwing for that query:
Sun Jan 19 17:30:09 2025 daemon.info dnsmasq[1]: 99 127.0.0.1/57004
query[NS] kk4.kleine-koenig.org from 127.0.0.1
Sun Jan 19 17:30:09 2025 daemon.info dnsmasq[1]: 99 127.0.0.1/57004
config kk4.kleine-koenig.org is NODATA
Not sure this is a problem for the DNSSEC verification though.
But there is an answer from the auth side:
root@happy:~# dig @192.168.128.4 kk4.kleine-koenig.org NS
; <<>> DiG 9.20.4 <<>> @192.168.128.4 kk4.kleine-koenig.org NS
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 19283
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;kk4.kleine-koenig.org. IN NS
;; ANSWER SECTION:
kk4.kleine-koenig.org. 600 IN NS happy.kleine-koenig.org.
;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.128.4#53(192.168.128.4) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Sun Jan 19 16:55:01 CET 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 108
> The DS record is the only thing that HAS to come from the parent, to prove
> that the child is not signed.
Ack.
Apart from the wrong server being asked I don't spot a relevant issue
when comparing the output of
delv +rtrace +mtrace @192.168.128.3 happy.kk4.kleine-koenig.org
delv +rtrace +mtrace @127.0.0.1 happy.kk4.kleine-koenig.org
I don't wanna spam the list with these outputs, but I can provide them
in private mail if you're interested. Having said that I think asking
the wrong server for some queries is a valid excuse for delv still
failing because the non-existance for kk4.kleine-koenig.org/DS isn't
properly signed then.
Best regards
Uwe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
