Le 04/06/2018 à 20:10, Mark Rousell a écrit :
On 04/06/2018 18:18, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
On 05/06/18 02:46, Mark Rousell wrote:> Anyway, I look forward to
Microsoft Enterprise Linux in due course. ;-)
NO WAY! It's bad enough with RHEL and it's competitors; if I need that
brand of Linux, I would go CentOS... but it will be a very cold day in
hell before I opted for a Microsoft version.
I chose the name 'Microsoft Enterprise Linux' deliberately. ;-)
In another message in this thread I predicted that Microsoft would buy
a major corporate Linux distribution some time soon. In my estimation,
the likeliest candidates are either Red Hat or Micro Focus's SUSE
business unit. Overall I think Red Hat would be the better choice,
albeit probably the more expensive choice, but I suspect either of
them would be a good fit for Microsoft's corporate business and
strategic direction.
I also bet for RHEL because
1) it has much more derivatives than Suse and these will be
placed in front of a BIG dilemma - what a fun for MS!
2) RHEL is already working to make this happen, by forcing
systemd everywhere.
Didier
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
