On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 21:07:24 +0200, Didier wrote in message 
<b39e290c-23f9-8653-7693-7a63f42ed...@in2p3.fr>:
> Le 04/06/2018 à 20:10, Mark Rousell a écrit :
> > On 04/06/2018 18:18, Andrew McGlashan wrote:  
> >> On 05/06/18 02:46, Mark Rousell wrote:> Anyway, I look forward to
> >> Microsoft Enterprise Linux in due course. ;-)
> >> NO WAY!  It's bad enough with RHEL and it's competitors; if I need
> >> that brand of Linux, I would go CentOS... but it will be a very
> >> cold day in hell before I opted for a Microsoft version.  
> >
> > I chose the name 'Microsoft Enterprise Linux' deliberately. ;-)
> >
> > In another message in this thread I predicted that Microsoft would
> > buy a major corporate Linux distribution some time soon. In my
> > estimation, the likeliest candidates are either Red Hat or Micro
> > Focus's SUSE business unit. Overall I think Red Hat would be the
> > better choice, albeit probably the more expensive choice, but I
> > suspect either of them would be a good fit for Microsoft's
> > corporate business and strategic direction.  
> 
>      I also bet for RHEL because
>          1) it has much more derivatives than Suse and these will be 
> placed in front of a BIG dilemma - what a fun for MS!
>          2) RHEL is already working to make this happen, by forcing 
> systemd everywhere.

..is there any surviving anti-systemd Red Hat derivative around?

..my guess is Microsoft will try buy Debian to destroy us, we still
use well over 95% Debian .debs in devuan.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to