On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 09:45, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 4:19 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 08:07:46PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > DJ & Tom - thank you for that clarification on how to interpret your > > > ranking, and I can assure you and other folks who feel similar about > > > answering that question that that is indeed the way we will be > analysing > > > the results - top ranked being best fit, 5th or last ranked being > least or > > > worst fit. Also for anyone who has yet to complete the survey, the last > > > question is an optional, free format answer so I would suggest using > that > > > to expand on reasons why you ranked certain areas #1, #2 etc for what > > > problems you see AI addressing in those parts of the project. > > > > > > I would also like to add that we deliberately took a positive tone for > this > > > survey as it is far too easy to find (many) negatives for AI (and for > good > > > reason!), and we wanted to try to look at the benefits we could get > from AI > > > instead if applied properly and wit the best interest of Fedora > driving the > > > use of AI in parts of the projects ecosystem. > > > > > > This survey is just trying to understand the preferences and wants of > the > > > Fedora community when it comes to AI, and not a guarantee that the > project > > > will be introducing AI in all of the mentioned areas. > > > > I can't see how this helps understand the Fedora contributor's > preferences > > about the use of AI, when the survey is restricting the possible answers > > to "yes", "definitely yes", "very much yes". I would question the > validity > > of any actions taken / priorities set in Fedora based on results of this > > survey. > > > > Indeed. This creates a skewed dataset because the questions you've > asked essentially prevent a set of responses from being captured. The > two choices people have are: pick the least worst option or just don't > participate in the survey. Neither of which are good things. > > > Continuing with a small comment:
this looks like one of those Human Resources surveys where they only want to know if their performance is: . good . great . outstanding And as we know, it's actually none of those Luís
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
