On 01/07/2024 20:07, Aoife Moloney wrote:

I would also like to add that we deliberately took a positive tone for this survey as it is far too easy to find (many) negatives for AI (and for good reason!), and we wanted to try to look at the benefits we could get from AI instead if applied properly and wit the best interest of Fedora driving the use of AI in parts of the projects ecosystem.

Well I guess if you're only interested in positive responses then
we can say the survey design is a success - just a shame that the
results will be meaningless.

I understand why surveys have to use closed form questions with a
fixed set of responses but it should always be possible to opt out
of questions and, ideally, to explicitly indicate that you do not
agree with any of the proposed responses, otherwise you are artificially
restricting the results to the set of concepts that were (either
deliberately or subconsciously) in the mind of the survey creator.

At the very least the question needs to be changed to not indicate
that two answers are required if five are!

Tom

--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to