On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 11:53:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:17:55AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > I can't see how this helps understand the Fedora contributor's preferences > > about the use of AI, when the survey is restricting the possible answers > > to "yes", "definitely yes", "very much yes". I would question the validity > > of any actions taken / priorities set in Fedora based on results of this > > survey. > > I don't think this is quite fair, as "No" is an option for the first "Is > AI/ML useful...." questions. But it does require trust that we will take the > second question's responses in that context. That was our intention, but we > should have allowed for explict negative responses in the second question, > or made it contingent on positive responses to the first.
The use cases in the two questions were somewhat differently worded, so while there's a bit of overlap, I didn't interpret the two questions as directly correlated / dependent. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
