On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 16:13 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 14:10 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On Sep 2, 2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> > > wrote: > > So I'm gonna start working on the 6.9.9 downgrade in F27, and I'm > > tempted to just downgrade Rawhide at the same time, and if we > > actually > > do decide to try 7 again, we can start over at that time. Do you > > agree > > with that plan? Thanks! (It doesn't change anything about the > > required > > epoch bumps, because even if we did 6.9.9 in F27 and stayed with 7 > > in > > Rawhide, we'd need to bump the epoch on *both* to ensure Rawhide's 7 > > was ahead of F27's 6). > > > > Based on the response from ImageMagick let's rebuild for version 6 in > > F27+. We should keep 7, but as ImageMagick7 instead. > > Well if we go to have ImageMagick6 and ImageMagick7 in F27+ and since > ImageMagick7 should be the main package, in my point of view , we > should add ImageMagick6 package and maintain ImageMagick as is , like, > for example, openssl-1.1 and compat-openssl10 .
Nope, that's exactly the opposite of what FESCo agreed: IM7 can only go in as the *variant* package, not the main one. The main one must be IM6. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
