On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 09:05:02AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >Would we be keeping these separate for a long time? Alternatives are > >really pretty ugly and I'd hate to see that introduced just for one > >release. > After handling all the rebuilds for version 7, it is pretty rare for > an upstream to support version 7 right now. I would strike an > uneducated guess at 1-2 years for upstreams to come around to > porting. It would not surprise me if some upstreams stay at version > 6 unless ImageMagick decides to stop supporting version 6. Not to
Ugh. How many of these are using the library and how many are shelling out? Could we just tack a 6 on the end of all of the older binaries? > mention the dead upstreams where we will have to port ourselves or > our friends at Canonical and Debian that don't even have version 7 > (or a recent version 6) in their repos. Or port those to GraphicsMagick as suggested elsewhere. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
