On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 09:59 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 09/02/2017 09:34 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Ugh. How many of these are using the library and how many are shelling > > out? Could we just tack a 6 on the end of all of the older binaries? > > > > The rebuilds were for library linked packages. I have not touched any > packages that > shell out. A reqpoquery returns about 46 packages that may do so. It may be > more > effective to add a "7" to the newer binaries. > > > Or port those to GraphicsMagick as suggested elsewhere. > > That's great, but that would be far beyond what I'm willing to work on. I > also don't > know how receptive upstreams would be to patches for that conversion. I > picked up > ImageMagick only two weeks ago to prevent a disaster from hitting stable > Fedora > releases. I am not positive I want to become a permanent maintainer of it.
Well, the easy option is just to revert to 6.9.9 and not update to 7 at all. It's not incumbent upon us to do so at least until upstream starts making noises about killing the 6 series, and there doesn't seem to be any particularly strong *reason* to do it... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
