On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 21:30 -0700, Moez Roy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 20:07 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > That is the point, how many package fail to build with ImageMagick7 ? > > > we "just" need change requires on FTBFS packages (with ImageMagick7) > > > > No it isn't the point. More things actually use the ImageMagick *CLI* > > than use the library, and the CLI of ImageMagick 7 is very different > > from the CLI of ImageMagick 6. This is the *main* reason we do not just > > want to make the ImageMagick package suddenly become ImageMagick 7 - > > because IM 7 does not provide the CLI people currently expect from the > > package called 'ImageMagick'. It's not primarily about things which > > build against the libraries. > > -- > > > > > > You are wrong about this. I tested convert and identify in my v7 builds, > and they work fine.
Uh...read this: https://www.imagemagick.org/script/porting.php#cli There's two-three pages (depending on your browser settings) of changes to how the CLI works, many of them backwards-incompatible. Just because there's still a command called 'convert' doesn't mean everything is the same. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
