On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 17:55 +0000, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > We didn't specifically rule on the naming, FWIW. As far as IM7 being the > variant package, we mostly ruled that for F27, nothing using IM in the > release blocking media may require IM7. I'm personally neutral on how the > files and packages are named as long as the implementation accomplishes > that goal.
well, okay, fine, I guess *technically* we could make ImageMagick be 7 and have ImageMagick6 and change the requirements in every single package that currently requires ImageMagick. But...let's not do that? :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
