Regression results are available: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4280?focusedCommentId=17888235&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17888235
I heard one off-list +1, and no -1s publicly or privately. Please let me know if anyone has any misgivings about the following plan. On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 10:05 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: > All, > > In looking at my schedule and thinking about the project more broadly, > I'm worried that moving pipes to its own module in Tika 3.x after we've had > two beta releases might be a large step. What would you think about this > timeline: > > Oct 2024 -- Release 3.0.0 (after regression tests and fixes and with > warnings about upcoming changes in tika-pipes in 4.x) > Oct 2024 -- move main branch to 4.x (and Java 17) and move tika-pipes to > its own module or create a standalone tika-pipes project > ??? -- start 4.0.0-BETA releases ASAP > April 2025 (6 months from Oct 2024) -- end support for 2.x (and thereby > Java 8) > April 2025 (6 months from Oct 2024 or earlier???) -- release 4.0.0 > Oct 2025 -- end support for 3.x (and thereby Java 11) > > I realize that even dependency maintenance on three concurrent branches > will be burdensome. Perhaps we fallback to "update dependencies before a > release and before the regression tests" at least on the 2.x and 3.x > branches? > > What do you all think? Many thanks! > > Best, > > Tim > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:39 AM Nicholas DiPiazza < > nicholas.dipia...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am going to do my best to remove pipes from Tika tonight and put all >> the code in the new repo. I have all night set aside for it. >> >> Conference call yes I can make that work if you want to communicate that >> way. >> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024, 8:56 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Nicholas and fellow devs, >>> I'm happy to set up a telecon if you'd like to discuss. I'm sorry that >>> I can't do the significant refactoring of tika-pipes in as timely manner as >>> I had hoped. :/ >>> I think getting 3.x out and then turning to this in 4.x makes sense, but >>> I definitely welcome discussion and progress however we can make it. >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 2:20 PM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> For 3.x, I think it might be. For 4.x, I think we should aim in that >>>> direction. What do others think? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 12:33 PM Nicholas DiPiazza < >>>> nicholas.dipia...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I feel like what I might want to do is remove pipes from Tika >>>>> completely >>>>> and create a second repository I've already done a lot of the work in >>>>> my >>>>> local workspace but I have a bunch more to go >>>>> >>>>> Does that sound like crazy talk? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024, 10:02 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > @Nicholas DiPiazza <ndipia...@apache.org> >>>>> > I don't think I'll have time to refactor tika-pipes out of tika-core >>>>> before >>>>> > the 3.x release. Is there an MVP we can do to get grpc working so >>>>> that we >>>>> > can release 3.x? >>>>> > >>>>> > All, >>>>> > Any blockers beyond the regression tests (and grpc)? >>>>> > >>>>> > Best, >>>>> > >>>>> > Tim >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:30 AM Gary D. Gregory <ggreg...@apache.org >>>>> > >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > Hi All, >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Is there a time frame for 3.0.0? It looks like Apache CXF 4.1.0 >>>>> depends >>>>> > on >>>>> > > 3.0.0 [1] and I'm waiting on CXF 4.1.0... Any guidance would be >>>>> > > appreciated. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > TY! >>>>> > > Gary >>>>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8671 >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On 2024/08/21 17:08:22 Nicholas DiPiazza wrote: >>>>> > > > I have a pull request for some class path loading fixes for Tika >>>>> grpc. >>>>> > > > Hoping to get that done today but it's a struggle so far >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024, 11:30 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > > All, >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > There are a couple of items documented on >>>>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4280 that we >>>>> wanted to >>>>> > take >>>>> > > > > care >>>>> > > > > of before the 3.0.0 release. >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > I can run a comparison btwn 2.x and 3.x on our regression >>>>> corpus, >>>>> > > and I >>>>> > > > > can try to deal with javadocs. >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > Any recs on how to wrap up the other issues? Are there any >>>>> other >>>>> > > blockers >>>>> > > > > not listed on that issue? >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > Thank you! >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > Best, >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > Tim >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>
