I feel like what I might want to do is remove pipes from Tika completely and create a second repository I've already done a lot of the work in my local workspace but I have a bunch more to go
Does that sound like crazy talk? On Tue, Sep 24, 2024, 10:02 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: > @Nicholas DiPiazza <ndipia...@apache.org> > I don't think I'll have time to refactor tika-pipes out of tika-core before > the 3.x release. Is there an MVP we can do to get grpc working so that we > can release 3.x? > > All, > Any blockers beyond the regression tests (and grpc)? > > Best, > > Tim > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:30 AM Gary D. Gregory <ggreg...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Is there a time frame for 3.0.0? It looks like Apache CXF 4.1.0 depends > on > > 3.0.0 [1] and I'm waiting on CXF 4.1.0... Any guidance would be > > appreciated. > > > > TY! > > Gary > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8671 > > > > On 2024/08/21 17:08:22 Nicholas DiPiazza wrote: > > > I have a pull request for some class path loading fixes for Tika grpc. > > > Hoping to get that done today but it's a struggle so far > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024, 11:30 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > There are a couple of items documented on > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4280 that we wanted to > take > > > > care > > > > of before the 3.0.0 release. > > > > > > > > I can run a comparison btwn 2.x and 3.x on our regression corpus, > > and I > > > > can try to deal with javadocs. > > > > > > > > Any recs on how to wrap up the other issues? Are there any other > > blockers > > > > not listed on that issue? > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > >
