Y, at least in tika-server and some of the other modules that use it as a web client (tika-parser-nlp, advanced-media, lang-detects, translate, transcribe tika-eval-core (?!?!?)
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 1:19 PM Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> wrote: > This is weird... Tika itself depends on Apache CXF, it currently uses > 4.0.5. > > I couldn't believe it but then I looked > https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/main/parent/pom.xml and it's true... > a search finds more: > https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fcxf%20tika&type=code > > Tilman > > On 24.09.2024 15:29, Gary D. Gregory wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Is there a time frame for 3.0.0? It looks like Apache CXF 4.1.0 depends > on 3.0.0 [1] and I'm waiting on CXF 4.1.0... Any guidance would be > appreciated. > > > > TY! > > Gary > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8671 > > > > On 2024/08/21 17:08:22 Nicholas DiPiazza wrote: > >> I have a pull request for some class path loading fixes for Tika grpc. > >> Hoping to get that done today but it's a struggle so far > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024, 11:30 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> All, > >>> > >>> There are a couple of items documented on > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4280 that we wanted to take > >>> care > >>> of before the 3.0.0 release. > >>> > >>> I can run a comparison btwn 2.x and 3.x on our regression corpus, > and I > >>> can try to deal with javadocs. > >>> > >>> Any recs on how to wrap up the other issues? Are there any other > blockers > >>> not listed on that issue? > >>> > >>> Thank you! > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> > >>> Tim > >>> > >
