Nicholas and fellow devs,
I'm happy to set up a telecon if you'd like to discuss. I'm sorry that I
can't do the significant refactoring of tika-pipes in as timely manner as I
had hoped. :/
I think getting 3.x out and then turning to this in 4.x makes sense, but I
definitely welcome discussion and progress however we can make it.
Thank you.
Best,
Tim
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 2:20 PM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote:
> For 3.x, I think it might be. For 4.x, I think we should aim in that
> direction. What do others think?
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 12:33 PM Nicholas DiPiazza <
> nicholas.dipia...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I feel like what I might want to do is remove pipes from Tika completely
>> and create a second repository I've already done a lot of the work in my
>> local workspace but I have a bunch more to go
>>
>> Does that sound like crazy talk?
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024, 10:02 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > @Nicholas DiPiazza <ndipia...@apache.org>
>> > I don't think I'll have time to refactor tika-pipes out of tika-core
>> before
>> > the 3.x release. Is there an MVP we can do to get grpc working so that
>> we
>> > can release 3.x?
>> >
>> > All,
>> > Any blockers beyond the regression tests (and grpc)?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Tim
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:30 AM Gary D. Gregory <ggreg...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > Is there a time frame for 3.0.0? It looks like Apache CXF 4.1.0
>> depends
>> > on
>> > > 3.0.0 [1] and I'm waiting on CXF 4.1.0... Any guidance would be
>> > > appreciated.
>> > >
>> > > TY!
>> > > Gary
>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8671
>> > >
>> > > On 2024/08/21 17:08:22 Nicholas DiPiazza wrote:
>> > > > I have a pull request for some class path loading fixes for Tika
>> grpc.
>> > > > Hoping to get that done today but it's a struggle so far
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024, 11:30 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > All,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > There are a couple of items documented on
>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4280 that we wanted to
>> > take
>> > > > > care
>> > > > > of before the 3.0.0 release.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I can run a comparison btwn 2.x and 3.x on our regression
>> corpus,
>> > > and I
>> > > > > can try to deal with javadocs.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Any recs on how to wrap up the other issues? Are there any other
>> > > blockers
>> > > > > not listed on that issue?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thank you!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Tim
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
