I am going to do my best to remove pipes from Tika tonight and put all the code in the new repo. I have all night set aside for it.
Conference call yes I can make that work if you want to communicate that way. On Mon, Sep 30, 2024, 8:56 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: > Nicholas and fellow devs, > I'm happy to set up a telecon if you'd like to discuss. I'm sorry that I > can't do the significant refactoring of tika-pipes in as timely manner as I > had hoped. :/ > I think getting 3.x out and then turning to this in 4.x makes sense, but I > definitely welcome discussion and progress however we can make it. > Thank you. > > Best, > > Tim > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 2:20 PM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: > >> For 3.x, I think it might be. For 4.x, I think we should aim in that >> direction. What do others think? >> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 12:33 PM Nicholas DiPiazza < >> nicholas.dipia...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I feel like what I might want to do is remove pipes from Tika completely >>> and create a second repository I've already done a lot of the work in my >>> local workspace but I have a bunch more to go >>> >>> Does that sound like crazy talk? >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024, 10:02 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> > @Nicholas DiPiazza <ndipia...@apache.org> >>> > I don't think I'll have time to refactor tika-pipes out of tika-core >>> before >>> > the 3.x release. Is there an MVP we can do to get grpc working so that >>> we >>> > can release 3.x? >>> > >>> > All, >>> > Any blockers beyond the regression tests (and grpc)? >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > >>> > Tim >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:30 AM Gary D. Gregory <ggreg...@apache.org> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi All, >>> > > >>> > > Is there a time frame for 3.0.0? It looks like Apache CXF 4.1.0 >>> depends >>> > on >>> > > 3.0.0 [1] and I'm waiting on CXF 4.1.0... Any guidance would be >>> > > appreciated. >>> > > >>> > > TY! >>> > > Gary >>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8671 >>> > > >>> > > On 2024/08/21 17:08:22 Nicholas DiPiazza wrote: >>> > > > I have a pull request for some class path loading fixes for Tika >>> grpc. >>> > > > Hoping to get that done today but it's a struggle so far >>> > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024, 11:30 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> >>> > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > All, >>> > > > > >>> > > > > There are a couple of items documented on >>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4280 that we wanted >>> to >>> > take >>> > > > > care >>> > > > > of before the 3.0.0 release. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > I can run a comparison btwn 2.x and 3.x on our regression >>> corpus, >>> > > and I >>> > > > > can try to deal with javadocs. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Any recs on how to wrap up the other issues? Are there any >>> other >>> > > blockers >>> > > > > not listed on that issue? >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Thank you! >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Best, >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Tim >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>
