Does cxf use anything but tika-core aside from in a "test" context? Not sure it matters if it does?
https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/main/rt/rs/extensions/search/pom.xml#L95 On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 2:19 PM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: > Y, at least in tika-server and some of the other modules that use it as a > web client (tika-parser-nlp, advanced-media, lang-detects, translate, > transcribe tika-eval-core (?!?!?) > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 1:19 PM Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> > wrote: > >> This is weird... Tika itself depends on Apache CXF, it currently uses >> 4.0.5. >> >> I couldn't believe it but then I looked >> https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/main/parent/pom.xml and it's true... >> a search finds more: >> https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fcxf%20tika&type=code >> >> Tilman >> >> On 24.09.2024 15:29, Gary D. Gregory wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Is there a time frame for 3.0.0? It looks like Apache CXF 4.1.0 depends >> on 3.0.0 [1] and I'm waiting on CXF 4.1.0... Any guidance would be >> appreciated. >> > >> > TY! >> > Gary >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8671 >> > >> > On 2024/08/21 17:08:22 Nicholas DiPiazza wrote: >> >> I have a pull request for some class path loading fixes for Tika grpc. >> >> Hoping to get that done today but it's a struggle so far >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024, 11:30 AM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> All, >> >>> >> >>> There are a couple of items documented on >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4280 that we wanted to >> take >> >>> care >> >>> of before the 3.0.0 release. >> >>> >> >>> I can run a comparison btwn 2.x and 3.x on our regression corpus, >> and I >> >>> can try to deal with javadocs. >> >>> >> >>> Any recs on how to wrap up the other issues? Are there any other >> blockers >> >>> not listed on that issue? >> >>> >> >>> Thank you! >> >>> >> >>> Best, >> >>> >> >>> Tim >> >>> >> >>
