dev  

Messages by Thread

• multi-wc-format: upgrading externals Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format: upgrading externals Julian Foad
  • Re: multi-wc-format: upgrading externals Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format: upgrading externals Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format: upgrading externals Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format: upgrading externals Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format: upgrading externals Julian Foad
• Creating future-version wc's Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Creating future-version wc's Julian Foad
  • Re: Creating future-version wc's Julian Foad
• Re: svn commit: r1898389 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_client.h libsvn_client/upgrade.c svn/info-cmd.c svn/svn.c Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: svn commit: r1898389 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_client.h libsvn_client/upgrade.c svn/info-cmd.c svn/svn.c Julian Foad
• Re: svn commit: r1898378 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ svn/ tests/cmdline/getopt_tests_data/ Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: svn commit: r1898378 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ svn/ tests/cmdline/getopt_tests_data/ Julian Foad
  • Re: svn commit: r1898378 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ svn/ tests/cmdline/getopt_tests_data/ Julian Foad
• Re: [PATCH] Sketch of per-user/per-wc config for pristines-mode (#4889) Julian Foad
• [PATCH] Pass remote to pinentry used in gpg-agent password store Chih-Hsuan Yen
• Re: document about Wayita Daniel Sahlberg
• Re: Make 'svn patch' keep permissions of patched files Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Make 'svn patch' keep permissions of patched files Ruediger Pluem
  • Re: Make 'svn patch' keep permissions of patched files Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Make 'svn patch' keep permissions of patched files Ruediger Pluem
  • Re: Make 'svn patch' keep permissions of patched files Daniel Shahaf
• multi-wc-format review Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Stefan Kueng
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Stefan Kueng
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Mark Phippard
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Julian Foad
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Julian Foad
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Julian Foad
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Julian Foad
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Nathan Hartman
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Julian Foad
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Nathan Hartman
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Julian Foad
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: multi-wc-format review Daniel Shahaf
• Re: svn commit: r1897443 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest: actions.py main.py Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: svn commit: r1897443 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest: actions.py main.py Jun Omae
  • Re: svn commit: r1897443 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest: actions.py main.py Daniel Shahaf
• Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync Julian Foad
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync Julian Foad
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync Julian Foad
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync (#4888) Julian Foad
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync (#4888) Julian Foad
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync (#4888) Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync (#4888) Julian Foad
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync (#4888) Karl Fogel
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync (#4888) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Pristines-on-demand: authz denied during textbase sync Daniel Shahaf
• Re: Multi-WC-format branch: preparing for merge to trunk Julian Foad
  • Re: Multi-WC-format branch: preparing for merge to trunk Julian Foad
  • Issue #4883: Multi-WC-format Julian Foad
• Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Initial patch for storing the pristines-on-demand setting in the working copy (Issue 4889) Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: Initial patch for storing the pristines-on-demand setting in the working copy (Issue 4889) Julian Foad
  • Re: Initial patch for storing the pristines-on-demand setting in the working copy (Issue 4889) Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Julian Foad
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format (was: Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525).) Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format (was: Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525).) Branko Čibej
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format (was: Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525).) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Branko Čibej
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Branko Čibej
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Martin Edgar Furter Rathod
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Glossary of attacks (was: Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Branko Čibej
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Linking to the archives (was: Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman

• Later messages