Hello everyone, On Thu, 2022-03-03 at 10:13 -0500, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 5:38 AM Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:28:51PM -0500, James McCoy wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 03:47:23PM +0000, Danilo Spinella wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am the openSUSE maintainer of subversion package. With the > > > > latest > > > > version, the automated build of subversion 1.14.1 for > > > > Tumbleweed is > > > > failing due to the following test failure: > > > > > > > > 1) > > > > testCrash_RequestChannel_nativeRead_AfterException(org.apache.s > > > > ubversion.javahl.BasicTests)junit.framework.AssertionFailedErro > > > > r: IOException was caught in run() > > > > at > > > > org.apache.subversion.javahl.BasicTests$TestTunnelAgent.joinAnd > > > > Test(BasicTests.java:4477) > > > > at > > > > org.apache.subversion.javahl.BasicTests.testCrash_RequestChanne > > > > l_nativeRead_AfterException(BasicTests.java:4679) > > > > at > > > > java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0 > > > > (Native Method) > > > > at > > > > java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( > > > > NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > > > > at > > > > java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.inv > > > > oke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > > > > at > > > > org.apache.subversion.javahl.RunTests.main(RunTests.java:119) > > > > > > This has come before in > > > < > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8qd682y9sfqcf433w0k2mly077cfm58x>. > > > > > > > This error is happening on ppc64, ppc64le and aarch64. I have > > > > been able > > > > to reproduce it in a VM with SLE-15-SP4, although it only > > > > triggered the > > > > second time I ran the tests. I have tried with both gcc7 and > > > > gcc11, and > > > > I had the same result. > > > > > > There's a proposed patch in > > > < > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/50dt3psygrdt5cr3j3grxonpp0c4osto> > > > which > > > addressed the issue in my testing. Could you verify if that > > > works for > > > you as well? > > > > We've been using this patch in the Fedora package since last year > > and > > have not seen the non-x86 test failures occur since putting it in, > > FWIW. > > (Thanks!) > > > > Regards, Joe > > > Looks like this patch fixes the failure for Debian and Fedora. If it > solves it for openSUSE also, we should consider committing and > nominating it for backport...
Yea, it fixes the issue for openSUSE too, which was also happening on x86_64 arch. Thank you for the help! > > Cheers, > Nathan > -- Best Regards, Danilo Spinella
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
