Daniel Shahaf wrote: > [...] Isn't this orthogonal to the > multi-wc-format work? To date it has always been possible to upgrade an > external without upgrading its parent [...] The > fact that the client doing the upgrade has multi-wc-format support > doesn't affect this logic. > > This would argue towards leaving SVN-4890 open, but making it not block > SVN-4883.
Good call. I changed this issue to not be a blocker for SVN-4883 (multi-wc-format).
