Hi Colin, If you have time could you please have a look at KIP-1025 and cast your vote? It is currently one vote short of being accepted. Any sort of feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks. On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 4:45 PM Mario Fiore Vitale <mvit...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Colin, > > > Do we feel that KIP-1040 can make feature freeze? > > I think yes but it all depends on the review. In any case the changes are > not so complex. > > Mario. > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:06 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Mario and Nelson, > > > > Thanks for asking. Both of these KIPs can certainly go in 3.9 if we can > > hit the deadlines. If you need an extra day or two just ping me. (But I > > don't want to extend things for too long!) :) > > > > Do we feel that KIP-1040 can make feature freeze? > > > > best, > > Colin > > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, at 01:48, Mario Fiore Vitale wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Can the KIP-1040[1] be included? It is accepted and a PR review is in > > > progress. > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1040%3A+Improve+handling+of+nullable+values+in+InsertField%2C+ExtractField%2C+and+other+transformations > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mario. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 8:28 AM Nelson B. <bachmanity...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> Can I include KIP-1025 > > >> < > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1025%3A+Optionally+URL-encode+clientID+and+clientSecret+in+authorization+header > > >> > > > >> in > > >> this release? > > >> It's currently in the voting stage, I hope it can receive enough votes > > by > > >> next week. > > >> > > >> Thanks. > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 5:32 AM José Armando García Sancio > > >> <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Would it be better to start a DISCUSS thread for 4.0 and keep this > > >> > thread for 3.9 discussions? We seem to have agreement on 3.9. > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:29 PM José Armando García Sancio > > >> > <jsan...@confluent.io> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > +1 for me. Thanks Colin for volunteering to be the release > manager. > > >> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:15 PM Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Hi all, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I think we should actually look at the target dates vs just > > looking > > >> at > > >> > the > > >> > > > release length. 3.9 is an August release. I suggest we aim for a > > >> > November > > >> > > > release for 4.0, which is 3 months (instead of 4). Why? Because > > >> > December is > > >> > > > a tricky month given holidays and all. And it gives us a buffer > > for > > >> > release > > >> > > > delays that still allows for a 4.0 in 2024. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Ismael > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:54 PM Matthias J. Sax < > > mj...@apache.org> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > In general I prefer to stick with the original time frame, > but I > > >> > believe > > >> > > > > an additional month would be good for KIP-848. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Maybe we can cut down 2 weeks for the 4.1 and 4.2 releases > > each, to > > >> > make > > >> > > > > up for the time? Not a must; just an idea. We can also just > > accept > > >> a > > >> > > > > one-time shift of the release time plan -- we did not really > > lose > > >> the > > >> > > > > time effectively, as there was one additional release. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > -Matthias > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On 6/17/24 12:14 PM, David Jacot wrote: > > >> > > > > > +1 for the release plan. Thanks! > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > +1 for releasing 4.0 four months after 3.9. 4.0 is actually > a > > >> > pretty big > > >> > > > > > release as we will GA KIP-848, including new group > coordinator > > >> and > > >> > new > > >> > > > > > consumer rebalance protocol. This is a pretty big change :). > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Best, > > >> > > > > > David > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Le lun. 17 juin 2024 à 20:36, Colin McCabe < > > cmcc...@apache.org> > > >> a > > >> > écrit > > >> > > > > : > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> Thanks, everyone. > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> Quick update: on the release plan page, I moved feature > > freeze > > >> > forward > > >> > > > > and > > >> > > > > >> code freeze by one week to make sure we can hit that. No > > other > > >> > dates > > >> > > > > >> changed. > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> With regard to 4.0, I was assuming that we'd do it 4 months > > >> after > > >> > 3.9 > > >> > > > > was > > >> > > > > >> released. I think for that release, we should front-load > all > > the > > >> > "remove > > >> > > > > >> deprecated stuff" work that has piled up, and try to really > > hit > > >> > all the > > >> > > > > >> release milestone dates. I don't think 4.0 needs to be a > very > > >> > ambitious > > >> > > > > >> release, it really is mostly about the removals and the new > > JDK > > >> > (which > > >> > > > > are > > >> > > > > >> a big deal, but I hope should fit within the normal > > timeframes). > > >> > That > > >> > > > > being > > >> > > > > >> said, if people want a shorter 4.0, I'm open to that, as > > long as > > >> > we're > > >> > > > > >> confident we could actually do that :) > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> best, > > >> > > > > >> Colin > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024, at 20:56, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > > >> > > > > >>> +1, thank you Colin > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> Given the July freeze deadlines, I take it we are going > with > > >> the > > >> > "short > > >> > > > > >>> 3.9.0 release" option and that the existence of this > release > > >> will > > >> > > > > impact > > >> > > > > >>> the 4.0.0 deadlines which will still follow the usual > > schedule > > >> > -- in > > >> > > > > >> other > > >> > > > > >>> words, this is an "additional release" outside of the > > regular > > >> > timeline. > > >> > > > > >> Is > > >> > > > > >>> this understanding correct? > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:57 PM Chia-Ping Tsai < > > >> > chia7...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>>> +1 thanks Colin! > > >> > > > > >>>> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > -José > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > -José > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Mario Fiore Vitale > > > > > > Senior Software Engineer > > > > > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> > > > <https://www.redhat.com/> > > > > > > -- > > Mario Fiore Vitale > > Senior Software Engineer > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> > <https://www.redhat.com/> >
