Hi Federico, Thanks for the KIP. I've added it to the release plan. I hope we can get it in this week or next, since feature freeze is imminent.
Colin On Sun, Jun 30, 2024, at 23:29, Federico Valeri wrote: > Hi Colin, is it possible to include this small KIP in the release plan? > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1057%3A+Add+remote+log+metadata+flag+to+the+dump+log+tool > > There is already an open PR. > > Thanks. > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 7:13 AM Nelson B. <bachmanity...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Colin, >> >> If you have time could you please have a look at KIP-1025 and cast your >> vote? >> It is currently one vote short of being accepted. Any sort of feedback >> would be appreciated. >> >> Thanks. >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 4:45 PM Mario Fiore Vitale <mvit...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Colin, >> > >> > > Do we feel that KIP-1040 can make feature freeze? >> > >> > I think yes but it all depends on the review. In any case the changes are >> > not so complex. >> > >> > Mario. >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:06 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Mario and Nelson, >> > > >> > > Thanks for asking. Both of these KIPs can certainly go in 3.9 if we can >> > > hit the deadlines. If you need an extra day or two just ping me. (But I >> > > don't want to extend things for too long!) :) >> > > >> > > Do we feel that KIP-1040 can make feature freeze? >> > > >> > > best, >> > > Colin >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, at 01:48, Mario Fiore Vitale wrote: >> > > > Hi all, >> > > > >> > > > Can the KIP-1040[1] be included? It is accepted and a PR review is in >> > > > progress. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1040%3A+Improve+handling+of+nullable+values+in+InsertField%2C+ExtractField%2C+and+other+transformations >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Mario. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 8:28 AM Nelson B. <bachmanity...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> Hello, >> > > >> >> > > >> Can I include KIP-1025 >> > > >> < >> > > >> >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1025%3A+Optionally+URL-encode+clientID+and+clientSecret+in+authorization+header >> > > >> > >> > > >> in >> > > >> this release? >> > > >> It's currently in the voting stage, I hope it can receive enough votes >> > > by >> > > >> next week. >> > > >> >> > > >> Thanks. >> > > >> >> > > >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 5:32 AM José Armando García Sancio >> > > >> <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> > Would it be better to start a DISCUSS thread for 4.0 and keep this >> > > >> > thread for 3.9 discussions? We seem to have agreement on 3.9. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:29 PM José Armando García Sancio >> > > >> > <jsan...@confluent.io> wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > +1 for me. Thanks Colin for volunteering to be the release >> > manager. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:15 PM Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > I think we should actually look at the target dates vs just >> > > looking >> > > >> at >> > > >> > the >> > > >> > > > release length. 3.9 is an August release. I suggest we aim for a >> > > >> > November >> > > >> > > > release for 4.0, which is 3 months (instead of 4). Why? Because >> > > >> > December is >> > > >> > > > a tricky month given holidays and all. And it gives us a buffer >> > > for >> > > >> > release >> > > >> > > > delays that still allows for a 4.0 in 2024. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > Ismael >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:54 PM Matthias J. Sax < >> > > mj...@apache.org> >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > In general I prefer to stick with the original time frame, >> > but I >> > > >> > believe >> > > >> > > > > an additional month would be good for KIP-848. >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > Maybe we can cut down 2 weeks for the 4.1 and 4.2 releases >> > > each, to >> > > >> > make >> > > >> > > > > up for the time? Not a must; just an idea. We can also just >> > > accept >> > > >> a >> > > >> > > > > one-time shift of the release time plan -- we did not really >> > > lose >> > > >> the >> > > >> > > > > time effectively, as there was one additional release. >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > -Matthias >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > On 6/17/24 12:14 PM, David Jacot wrote: >> > > >> > > > > > +1 for the release plan. Thanks! >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > +1 for releasing 4.0 four months after 3.9. 4.0 is actually >> > a >> > > >> > pretty big >> > > >> > > > > > release as we will GA KIP-848, including new group >> > coordinator >> > > >> and >> > > >> > new >> > > >> > > > > > consumer rebalance protocol. This is a pretty big change :). >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > Best, >> > > >> > > > > > David >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > Le lun. 17 juin 2024 à 20:36, Colin McCabe < >> > > cmcc...@apache.org> >> > > >> a >> > > >> > écrit >> > > >> > > > > : >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> Hi all, >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> Thanks, everyone. >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> Quick update: on the release plan page, I moved feature >> > > freeze >> > > >> > forward >> > > >> > > > > and >> > > >> > > > > >> code freeze by one week to make sure we can hit that. No >> > > other >> > > >> > dates >> > > >> > > > > >> changed. >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> With regard to 4.0, I was assuming that we'd do it 4 months >> > > >> after >> > > >> > 3.9 >> > > >> > > > > was >> > > >> > > > > >> released. I think for that release, we should front-load >> > all >> > > the >> > > >> > "remove >> > > >> > > > > >> deprecated stuff" work that has piled up, and try to really >> > > hit >> > > >> > all the >> > > >> > > > > >> release milestone dates. I don't think 4.0 needs to be a >> > very >> > > >> > ambitious >> > > >> > > > > >> release, it really is mostly about the removals and the new >> > > JDK >> > > >> > (which >> > > >> > > > > are >> > > >> > > > > >> a big deal, but I hope should fit within the normal >> > > timeframes). >> > > >> > That >> > > >> > > > > being >> > > >> > > > > >> said, if people want a shorter 4.0, I'm open to that, as >> > > long as >> > > >> > we're >> > > >> > > > > >> confident we could actually do that :) >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> best, >> > > >> > > > > >> Colin >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024, at 20:56, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: >> > > >> > > > > >>> +1, thank you Colin >> > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >> > > > > >>> Given the July freeze deadlines, I take it we are going >> > with >> > > >> the >> > > >> > "short >> > > >> > > > > >>> 3.9.0 release" option and that the existence of this >> > release >> > > >> will >> > > >> > > > > impact >> > > >> > > > > >>> the 4.0.0 deadlines which will still follow the usual >> > > schedule >> > > >> > -- in >> > > >> > > > > >> other >> > > >> > > > > >>> words, this is an "additional release" outside of the >> > > regular >> > > >> > timeline. >> > > >> > > > > >> Is >> > > >> > > > > >>> this understanding correct? >> > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >> > > > > >>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:57 PM Chia-Ping Tsai < >> > > >> > chia7...@gmail.com> >> > > >> > > > > >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >> > > > > >>>> +1 thanks Colin! >> > > >> > > > > >>>> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > >> > > -José >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > -- >> > > >> > -José >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > >> > > > Mario Fiore Vitale >> > > > >> > > > Senior Software Engineer >> > > > >> > > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >> > > > <https://www.redhat.com/> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Mario Fiore Vitale >> > >> > Senior Software Engineer >> > >> > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >> > <https://www.redhat.com/> >> >
