Would it be better to start a DISCUSS thread for 4.0 and keep this thread for 3.9 discussions? We seem to have agreement on 3.9.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:29 PM José Armando García Sancio <jsan...@confluent.io> wrote: > > +1 for me. Thanks Colin for volunteering to be the release manager. > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:15 PM Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I think we should actually look at the target dates vs just looking at the > > release length. 3.9 is an August release. I suggest we aim for a November > > release for 4.0, which is 3 months (instead of 4). Why? Because December is > > a tricky month given holidays and all. And it gives us a buffer for release > > delays that still allows for a 4.0 in 2024. > > > > Ismael > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:54 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > In general I prefer to stick with the original time frame, but I believe > > > an additional month would be good for KIP-848. > > > > > > Maybe we can cut down 2 weeks for the 4.1 and 4.2 releases each, to make > > > up for the time? Not a must; just an idea. We can also just accept a > > > one-time shift of the release time plan -- we did not really lose the > > > time effectively, as there was one additional release. > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > On 6/17/24 12:14 PM, David Jacot wrote: > > > > +1 for the release plan. Thanks! > > > > > > > > +1 for releasing 4.0 four months after 3.9. 4.0 is actually a pretty big > > > > release as we will GA KIP-848, including new group coordinator and new > > > > consumer rebalance protocol. This is a pretty big change :). > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > David > > > > > > > > Le lun. 17 juin 2024 à 20:36, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> a écrit > > > : > > > > > > > >> Hi all, > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, everyone. > > > >> > > > >> Quick update: on the release plan page, I moved feature freeze forward > > > and > > > >> code freeze by one week to make sure we can hit that. No other dates > > > >> changed. > > > >> > > > >> With regard to 4.0, I was assuming that we'd do it 4 months after 3.9 > > > was > > > >> released. I think for that release, we should front-load all the > > > >> "remove > > > >> deprecated stuff" work that has piled up, and try to really hit all the > > > >> release milestone dates. I don't think 4.0 needs to be a very ambitious > > > >> release, it really is mostly about the removals and the new JDK (which > > > are > > > >> a big deal, but I hope should fit within the normal timeframes). That > > > being > > > >> said, if people want a shorter 4.0, I'm open to that, as long as we're > > > >> confident we could actually do that :) > > > >> > > > >> best, > > > >> Colin > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024, at 20:56, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > > > >>> +1, thank you Colin > > > >>> > > > >>> Given the July freeze deadlines, I take it we are going with the > > > >>> "short > > > >>> 3.9.0 release" option and that the existence of this release will > > > impact > > > >>> the 4.0.0 deadlines which will still follow the usual schedule -- in > > > >> other > > > >>> words, this is an "additional release" outside of the regular > > > >>> timeline. > > > >> Is > > > >>> this understanding correct? > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:57 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> +1 thanks Colin! > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > -José -- -José
