Hi all, I think we should actually look at the target dates vs just looking at the release length. 3.9 is an August release. I suggest we aim for a November release for 4.0, which is 3 months (instead of 4). Why? Because December is a tricky month given holidays and all. And it gives us a buffer for release delays that still allows for a 4.0 in 2024.
Ismael On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:54 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > In general I prefer to stick with the original time frame, but I believe > an additional month would be good for KIP-848. > > Maybe we can cut down 2 weeks for the 4.1 and 4.2 releases each, to make > up for the time? Not a must; just an idea. We can also just accept a > one-time shift of the release time plan -- we did not really lose the > time effectively, as there was one additional release. > > > -Matthias > > > On 6/17/24 12:14 PM, David Jacot wrote: > > +1 for the release plan. Thanks! > > > > +1 for releasing 4.0 four months after 3.9. 4.0 is actually a pretty big > > release as we will GA KIP-848, including new group coordinator and new > > consumer rebalance protocol. This is a pretty big change :). > > > > Best, > > David > > > > Le lun. 17 juin 2024 à 20:36, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> a écrit > : > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Thanks, everyone. > >> > >> Quick update: on the release plan page, I moved feature freeze forward > and > >> code freeze by one week to make sure we can hit that. No other dates > >> changed. > >> > >> With regard to 4.0, I was assuming that we'd do it 4 months after 3.9 > was > >> released. I think for that release, we should front-load all the "remove > >> deprecated stuff" work that has piled up, and try to really hit all the > >> release milestone dates. I don't think 4.0 needs to be a very ambitious > >> release, it really is mostly about the removals and the new JDK (which > are > >> a big deal, but I hope should fit within the normal timeframes). That > being > >> said, if people want a shorter 4.0, I'm open to that, as long as we're > >> confident we could actually do that :) > >> > >> best, > >> Colin > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024, at 20:56, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > >>> +1, thank you Colin > >>> > >>> Given the July freeze deadlines, I take it we are going with the "short > >>> 3.9.0 release" option and that the existence of this release will > impact > >>> the 4.0.0 deadlines which will still follow the usual schedule -- in > >> other > >>> words, this is an "additional release" outside of the regular timeline. > >> Is > >>> this understanding correct? > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:57 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 thanks Colin! > >>>> > >> > > >
