+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Alex
Le jeu. 29 janv. 2026 à 08:19, Bharath Krishna <[email protected]> a écrit : > +1, that was a missing piece for view authorization! > > On 2026/01/29 07:03:31 roryqi wrote: > > +1, excited to see this. I am working on related work about Apache > Gravitino. > > > > Christian Thiel <[email protected]> 于2026年1月29日周四 14:50写道： > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Gábor Kaszab <[email protected]> schrieb am Do. 29. Jan. 2026 um > 07:22: > > >> > > >> +1 (nb) > > >> > > >> Gábor > > >> > > >> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026, 00:02 Adnan Hemani via dev, < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:17 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 > > >>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 8:02 AM Russell Spitzer < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> +1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:01 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 6:29 PM Prashant Singh < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hello everyone ! > > >>>>>>> The namespace separator for nested namespaces discussion is > converged (thanks a ton Eduard) > > >>>>>>> I additionally also added wording for the nested views per the > feedback. > > >>>>>>> The spec proposal [1] is ready for review again, I have also > updated the reference implementation too from client side [2] per spec. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Please do have a pass and vote based on how you all feel, when > you get some time. Appreciate all the feedback so far ! > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810 > > >>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>> Prashant Singh > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 10:04 AM Prashant Singh < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback, Ryan. I agree that we should leave the > vote open longer and get the wording right. I'll work on addressing the new > feedbacks. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>> Prashant Singh > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 8:59 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I think this is a good addition, but I think it may need a bit > of work to get the wording right and there's still ongoing discussion. > Maybe we should leave this vote open longer until the discussion settles? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Also, I want to point out that this is another use of a > specific separator char. I think it would be good to revisit our separator > discussion and finally close on it. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 12:33 AM John Zhuge <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:23 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 on the spec change. It’s a solid first step toward > enabling DEFINER views. As usual, the spec change is intentionally kept > separate from access control. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yufei > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 8:18 AM huaxin gao < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 6:38 PM Prashant Singh < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose adding an optional referenced-by to the REST > loadTable call, which will contain the fully qualified name of the view > (namespace of the view name and the view name) in case the table is being > referenced by a view. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This will be really helpful in a couple of ways : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. First step towards enabling DEFINER views > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Audit, incase one wants to track what's the base > objects accessed from the direct object accessed (example: doc) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> For details please check: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Spec change PR: > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Reference Implementation PR: > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Discuss Thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/01gb9rygdd1gqks7lnl1o6440qocnh9m > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant Singh > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>> John Zhuge > > >
