+1 (non-binding) Gábor Kaszab <[email protected]> schrieb am Do. 29. Jan. 2026 um 07:22:
> +1 (nb) > > Gábor > > On Thu, 29 Jan 2026, 00:02 Adnan Hemani via dev, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:17 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 8:02 AM Russell Spitzer < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:01 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 6:29 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello everyone ! >>>>>> The namespace separator for nested namespaces discussion is converged >>>>>> (thanks a ton Eduard) >>>>>> I additionally also added wording for the nested views per the >>>>>> feedback. >>>>>> The spec proposal [1] is ready for review again, I have also updated >>>>>> the reference implementation too from client side [2] per spec. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please do have a pass and vote based on how you all feel, when you >>>>>> get some time. Appreciate all the feedback so far ! >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810 >>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979 >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Prashant Singh >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 10:04 AM Prashant Singh < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback, Ryan. I agree that we should leave the vote >>>>>>> open longer and get the wording right. I'll work on addressing the new >>>>>>> feedbacks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Prashant Singh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 8:59 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think this is a good addition, but I think it may need a bit of >>>>>>>> work to get the wording right and there's still ongoing discussion. >>>>>>>> Maybe >>>>>>>> we should leave this vote open longer until the discussion settles? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also, I want to point out that this is another use of a specific >>>>>>>> separator char. I think it would be good to revisit our separator >>>>>>>> discussion and finally close on it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 12:33 AM John Zhuge <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:23 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 on the spec change. It’s a solid first step toward enabling >>>>>>>>>> DEFINER views. As usual, the spec change is intentionally kept >>>>>>>>>> separate >>>>>>>>>> from access control. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yufei >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 8:18 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 6:38 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>>>>> I propose adding an *optional* referenced-by to the REST >>>>>>>>>>>> loadTable call, which will contain the fully qualified name of the >>>>>>>>>>>> view >>>>>>>>>>>> (namespace of the view name and the view name) in case the table >>>>>>>>>>>> is being >>>>>>>>>>>> referenced by a view. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This will be really helpful in a couple of ways : >>>>>>>>>>>> 1. First step towards enabling DEFINER >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://trino.io/docs/current/sql/create-view.html#security> >>>>>>>>>>>> views >>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Audit, incase one wants to track what's the base objects >>>>>>>>>>>> accessed from the direct object accessed (example: doc >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/account-usage/access_history#columns>) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> For details please check: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> - Spec change PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810 >>>>>>>>>>>> - Reference Implementation PR: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979 >>>>>>>>>>>> - Discuss Thread: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/01gb9rygdd1gqks7lnl1o6440qocnh9m >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant Singh >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> John Zhuge >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
