+1 On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 8:02 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:01 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 6:29 PM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone ! >>> The namespace separator for nested namespaces discussion is converged >>> (thanks a ton Eduard) >>> I additionally also added wording for the nested views per the feedback. >>> The spec proposal [1] is ready for review again, I have also updated the >>> reference implementation too from client side [2] per spec. >>> >>> Please do have a pass and vote based on how you all feel, when you get >>> some time. Appreciate all the feedback so far ! >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810 >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979 >>> >>> Best, >>> Prashant Singh >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 10:04 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the feedback, Ryan. I agree that we should leave the vote >>>> open longer and get the wording right. I'll work on addressing the new >>>> feedbacks. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Prashant Singh >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 8:59 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think this is a good addition, but I think it may need a bit of work >>>>> to get the wording right and there's still ongoing discussion. Maybe we >>>>> should leave this vote open longer until the discussion settles? >>>>> >>>>> Also, I want to point out that this is another use of a specific >>>>> separator char. I think it would be good to revisit our separator >>>>> discussion and finally close on it. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 12:33 AM John Zhuge <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:23 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 on the spec change. It’s a solid first step toward enabling >>>>>>> DEFINER views. As usual, the spec change is intentionally kept separate >>>>>>> from access control. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yufei >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 8:18 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 6:38 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>> I propose adding an *optional* referenced-by to the REST >>>>>>>>> loadTable call, which will contain the fully qualified name of the >>>>>>>>> view >>>>>>>>> (namespace of the view name and the view name) in case the table is >>>>>>>>> being >>>>>>>>> referenced by a view. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This will be really helpful in a couple of ways : >>>>>>>>> 1. First step towards enabling DEFINER >>>>>>>>> <https://trino.io/docs/current/sql/create-view.html#security> >>>>>>>>> views >>>>>>>>> 2. Audit, incase one wants to track what's the base objects >>>>>>>>> accessed from the direct object accessed (example: doc >>>>>>>>> <https://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/account-usage/access_history#columns>) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For details please check: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Spec change PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810 >>>>>>>>> - Reference Implementation PR: >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979 >>>>>>>>> - Discuss Thread: >>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/01gb9rygdd1gqks7lnl1o6440qocnh9m >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Prashant Singh >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> John Zhuge >>>>>> >>>>>
