+1, excited to see this. I am working on related work about Apache Gravitino.

Christian Thiel <[email protected]> 于2026年1月29日周四 14:50写道:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Gábor Kaszab <[email protected]> schrieb am Do. 29. Jan. 2026 um 07:22:
>>
>> +1 (nb)
>>
>> Gábor
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026, 00:02 Adnan Hemani via dev, <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:17 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 8:02 AM Russell Spitzer 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:01 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner 
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 6:29 PM Prashant Singh 
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello everyone !
>>>>>>> The namespace separator for nested namespaces discussion is converged 
>>>>>>> (thanks a ton Eduard)
>>>>>>> I additionally also added wording for the nested views per the feedback.
>>>>>>> The spec proposal [1] is ready for review again, I have also updated 
>>>>>>> the reference implementation too from client side [2] per spec.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please do have a pass and vote based on how you all feel, when you get 
>>>>>>> some time. Appreciate all the feedback so far !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810
>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Prashant Singh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 10:04 AM Prashant Singh 
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback, Ryan. I agree that we should leave the vote 
>>>>>>>> open longer and get the wording right. I'll work on addressing the new 
>>>>>>>> feedbacks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Prashant Singh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 8:59 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think this is a good addition, but I think it may need a bit of 
>>>>>>>>> work to get the wording right and there's still ongoing discussion. 
>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should leave this vote open longer until the discussion 
>>>>>>>>> settles?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, I want to point out that this is another use of a specific 
>>>>>>>>> separator char. I think it would be good to revisit our separator 
>>>>>>>>> discussion and finally close on it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 12:33 AM John Zhuge <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:23 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 on the spec change. It’s a solid first step toward enabling 
>>>>>>>>>>> DEFINER views. As usual, the spec change is intentionally kept 
>>>>>>>>>>> separate from access control.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yufei
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 8:18 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 6:38 PM Prashant Singh 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose adding an optional referenced-by to the REST loadTable 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> call, which will contain the fully qualified name of the view 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (namespace of the view name and the view name) in case the table 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is being referenced by a view.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will be really helpful in a couple of ways :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. First step towards enabling DEFINER views
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Audit, incase one wants to track what's the base objects 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> accessed from the direct object accessed (example: doc)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For details please check:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Spec change PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Reference Implementation PR: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Discuss Thread: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/01gb9rygdd1gqks7lnl1o6440qocnh9m
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant Singh
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> John Zhuge

Reply via email to