+1 On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:01 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < [email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 6:29 PM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello everyone ! >> The namespace separator for nested namespaces discussion is converged >> (thanks a ton Eduard) >> I additionally also added wording for the nested views per the feedback. >> The spec proposal [1] is ready for review again, I have also updated the >> reference implementation too from client side [2] per spec. >> >> Please do have a pass and vote based on how you all feel, when you get >> some time. Appreciate all the feedback so far ! >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810 >> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979 >> >> Best, >> Prashant Singh >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 10:04 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the feedback, Ryan. I agree that we should leave the vote >>> open longer and get the wording right. I'll work on addressing the new >>> feedbacks. >>> >>> Best, >>> Prashant Singh >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 8:59 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I think this is a good addition, but I think it may need a bit of work >>>> to get the wording right and there's still ongoing discussion. Maybe we >>>> should leave this vote open longer until the discussion settles? >>>> >>>> Also, I want to point out that this is another use of a specific >>>> separator char. I think it would be good to revisit our separator >>>> discussion and finally close on it. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 12:33 AM John Zhuge <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:23 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 on the spec change. It’s a solid first step toward enabling >>>>>> DEFINER views. As usual, the spec change is intentionally kept separate >>>>>> from access control. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yufei >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 8:18 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 6:38 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>> I propose adding an *optional* referenced-by to the REST loadTable >>>>>>>> call, which will contain the fully qualified name of the view >>>>>>>> (namespace of >>>>>>>> the view name and the view name) in case the table is being referenced >>>>>>>> by a >>>>>>>> view. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This will be really helpful in a couple of ways : >>>>>>>> 1. First step towards enabling DEFINER >>>>>>>> <https://trino.io/docs/current/sql/create-view.html#security> >>>>>>>> views >>>>>>>> 2. Audit, incase one wants to track what's the base objects >>>>>>>> accessed from the direct object accessed (example: doc >>>>>>>> <https://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/account-usage/access_history#columns>) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For details please check: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Spec change PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810 >>>>>>>> - Reference Implementation PR: >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979 >>>>>>>> - Discuss Thread: >>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/01gb9rygdd1gqks7lnl1o6440qocnh9m >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Prashant Singh >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> John Zhuge >>>>> >>>>
