+1, that was a missing piece for view authorization!
On 2026/01/29 07:03:31 roryqi wrote: > +1, excited to see this. I am working on related work about Apache Gravitino. > > Christian Thiel <[email protected]> 于2026年1月29日周四 14:50写道： > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Gábor Kaszab <[email protected]> schrieb am Do. 29. Jan. 2026 um 07:22: > >> > >> +1 (nb) > >> > >> Gábor > >> > >> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026, 00:02 Adnan Hemani via dev, <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:17 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 8:02 AM Russell Spitzer > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:01 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner > >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 6:29 PM Prashant Singh > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hello everyone ! > >>>>>>> The namespace separator for nested namespaces discussion is converged > >>>>>>> (thanks a ton Eduard) > >>>>>>> I additionally also added wording for the nested views per the > >>>>>>> feedback. > >>>>>>> The spec proposal [1] is ready for review again, I have also updated > >>>>>>> the reference implementation too from client side [2] per spec. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Please do have a pass and vote based on how you all feel, when you > >>>>>>> get some time. Appreciate all the feedback so far ! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810 > >>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> Prashant Singh > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 10:04 AM Prashant Singh > >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback, Ryan. I agree that we should leave the vote > >>>>>>>> open longer and get the wording right. I'll work on addressing the > >>>>>>>> new feedbacks. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>> Prashant Singh > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 8:59 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I think this is a good addition, but I think it may need a bit of > >>>>>>>>> work to get the wording right and there's still ongoing discussion. > >>>>>>>>> Maybe we should leave this vote open longer until the discussion > >>>>>>>>> settles? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Also, I want to point out that this is another use of a specific > >>>>>>>>> separator char. I think it would be good to revisit our separator > >>>>>>>>> discussion and finally close on it. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 12:33 AM John Zhuge <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:23 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 on the spec change. It’s a solid first step toward enabling > >>>>>>>>>>> DEFINER views. As usual, the spec change is intentionally kept > >>>>>>>>>>> separate from access control. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Yufei > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 8:18 AM huaxin gao > >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 6:38 PM Prashant Singh > >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose adding an optional referenced-by to the REST > >>>>>>>>>>>>> loadTable call, which will contain the fully qualified name of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the view (namespace of the view name and the view name) in case > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the table is being referenced by a view. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This will be really helpful in a couple of ways : > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. First step towards enabling DEFINER views > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Audit, incase one wants to track what's the base objects > >>>>>>>>>>>>> accessed from the direct object accessed (example: doc) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> For details please check: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Spec change PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13810 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Reference Implementation PR: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13979 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Discuss Thread: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/01gb9rygdd1gqks7lnl1o6440qocnh9m > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant Singh > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> John Zhuge >
