The vote passes with 10 +1's (3 binding).  I'll merge the spec
clarification.

Thanks all for voting!
Szehon

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 11:25 AM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 4:25 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1(binding) Thanks Szehon!
>> Yufei
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 3:29 PM Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:50 PM Prashant Singh <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> > Prashant
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 10:44 PM Kristin Cowalcijk <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:12 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 6:49 AM Huang-Hsiang Cheng
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Oct 8, 2025, at 1:03 PM, Steven Wu <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> +1 (binding)
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:53 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:30 AM Jia Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> Hi Szehon,
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> Thanks for starting the vote.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> Jia
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:25 Szehon Ho <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> Hi
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> I would like to start a vote about adding a restriction to the
>>> new Geometry type (at least in V3) to not allow wraparound CRS's, to reduce
>>> ambiguity as folks start implementation.  See the DISCUSS thread at
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/x9ll3rhg26mngm10cjn74w66ov23grmm.
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> The Iceberg spec addendum proposed is
>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14250.
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the
>>> necessary
>>> >> >>>>> number of votes are reached.
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> >> >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> >> >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> Thanks!
>>> >> >>>>> Szehon
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to