+1 (binding)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 4:25 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1(binding) Thanks Szehon!
> Yufei
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 3:29 PM Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:50 PM Prashant Singh <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Prashant
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 10:44 PM Kristin Cowalcijk <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 (non-binding)
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:12 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 6:49 AM Huang-Hsiang Cheng
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> +1 (non-binding)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Oct 8, 2025, at 1:03 PM, Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> +1 (binding)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:53 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:30 AM Jia Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Hi Szehon,
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Thanks for starting the vote.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Jia
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:25 Szehon Ho <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Hi
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I would like to start a vote about adding a restriction to the
>> new Geometry type (at least in V3) to not allow wraparound CRS's, to reduce
>> ambiguity as folks start implementation.  See the DISCUSS thread at
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/x9ll3rhg26mngm10cjn74w66ov23grmm.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> The Iceberg spec addendum proposed is
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14250.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the
>> necessary
>> >> >>>>> number of votes are reached.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>> >> >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> >> >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Thanks!
>> >> >>>>> Szehon
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>>
>

Reply via email to