+1 (non-binding)

On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:12 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 6:49 AM Huang-Hsiang Cheng <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Oct 8, 2025, at 1:03 PM, Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:53 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:30 AM Jia Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Szehon,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for starting the vote.
>>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> Jia
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:25 Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to start a vote about adding a restriction to the new 
>>>>> Geometry type (at least in V3) to not allow wraparound CRS's, to reduce 
>>>>> ambiguity as folks start implementation.  See the DISCUSS thread at 
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/x9ll3rhg26mngm10cjn74w66ov23grmm.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Iceberg spec addendum proposed is 
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14250.
>>>>>
>>>>> The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary
>>>>> number of votes are reached.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> Szehon
>>
>>

Reply via email to