+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:50 PM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Prashant > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 10:44 PM Kristin Cowalcijk <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:12 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 6:49 AM Huang-Hsiang Cheng >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >> >> On Oct 8, 2025, at 1:03 PM, Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:53 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:30 AM Jia Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi Szehon, >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks for starting the vote. >> >>>> >> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>>> >> >>>> Jia >> >>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:25 Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Hi >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I would like to start a vote about adding a restriction to the new >> >>>>> Geometry type (at least in V3) to not allow wraparound CRS's, to >> >>>>> reduce ambiguity as folks start implementation. See the DISCUSS >> >>>>> thread at >> >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/x9ll3rhg26mngm10cjn74w66ov23grmm. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The Iceberg spec addendum proposed is >> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14250. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary >> >>>>> number of votes are reached. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> [ ] +1 approve >> >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks! >> >>>>> Szehon >> >> >> >>
