+1 (non-binding) Best, Prashant
On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 10:44 PM Kristin Cowalcijk <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:12 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 6:49 AM Huang-Hsiang Cheng > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> On Oct 8, 2025, at 1:03 PM, Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:53 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:30 AM Jia Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Szehon, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for starting the vote. > >>>> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>> > >>>> Jia > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 11:25 Szehon Ho <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi > >>>>> > >>>>> I would like to start a vote about adding a restriction to the new > Geometry type (at least in V3) to not allow wraparound CRS's, to reduce > ambiguity as folks start implementation. See the DISCUSS thread at > https://lists.apache.org/thread/x9ll3rhg26mngm10cjn74w66ov23grmm. > >>>>> > >>>>> The Iceberg spec addendum proposed is > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14250. > >>>>> > >>>>> The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary > >>>>> number of votes are reached. > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 approve > >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks! > >>>>> Szehon > >> > >> >
