0
On 25.04.24 21:54, Alagappan Maruthappan wrote:
+1 for separate table and view objects.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:33 PM Russell Spitzer
<russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 to separate.
> On Apr 25, 2024, at 2:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
<j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
> +1 to separate, it makes sense to me.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:50 AM Walaa Eldin Moustafa
> <wa.moust...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I would like to make a proposal for issue [1] to support
materialized views in Iceberg. The support leverages two separate
objects, an Iceberg view and an Iceberg table to implement
materialized views. Each object retains relevant metadata to
support the MV operations. An initial design, which we can refine,
is detailed in the description section of this PR [2].
>>
>> This proposal is the outcome of extensive community discussions
in various forums [3, 4, 5, 6, 7].
>>
>> Please respond with your recommendation:
>> +1 if you support moving forward with the two separate objects
model.
>> 0 if you are neutral.
>> -1 if you disagree with the two separate objects model.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Walaa.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10043
>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9830
>> [3]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zg0wQ5bVKTckf7-K_cdwF4mlRi6sixLcyEh6jErpGYY
>> [4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420
>> [5]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UnhldHhe3Grz8JBngwXPA6ZZord1xMedY5ukEhZYF
>> [6]
https://lists.apache.org/thread/tb3wcs7czjvjbq9y1qtr87g9s95ky5zh
>> [7]
https://lists.apache.org/thread/l6cvrp4r1001k08cy2ypybzy2kgxpt1y
