+1 for the proposal. - Ajantha
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 7:29 AM Benny Chow <btc...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for separate view and table objects. Walaa's Spark > implementation demonstrates how little change it takes on the Iceberg APIs > to start sharing MVs between engines. > > Thanks > Benny > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:52 AM Walaa Eldin Moustafa < > wa.moust...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I would like to make a proposal for issue [1] to support materialized >> views in Iceberg. The support leverages two separate objects, an Iceberg >> view and an Iceberg table to implement materialized views. Each object >> retains relevant metadata to support the MV operations. An initial design, >> which we can refine, is detailed in the description section of this PR [2]. >> >> This proposal is the outcome of extensive community discussions in >> various forums [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. >> >> Please respond with your recommendation: >> +1 if you support moving forward with the two separate objects model. >> 0 if you are neutral. >> -1 if you disagree with the two separate objects model. >> >> Thanks, >> Walaa. >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10043 >> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9830 >> [3] >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zg0wQ5bVKTckf7-K_cdwF4mlRi6sixLcyEh6jErpGYY >> [4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420 >> [5] >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UnhldHhe3Grz8JBngwXPA6ZZord1xMedY5ukEhZYF >> [6] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tb3wcs7czjvjbq9y1qtr87g9s95ky5zh >> [7] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l6cvrp4r1001k08cy2ypybzy2kgxpt1y >> >
