Thanks everyone for participating in the proposal and discussions. The vote
is now closed and the proposal for separate view and table objects model
has passed with the following counts:
* 11 (+1)
* 1 (0)
* 0 (-1)

I will start a separate thread for the next steps.

Thanks,
Walaa.


On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:36 AM Jan Kaul <jank...@mailbox.org.invalid>
wrote:

> 0
> On 25.04.24 21:54, Alagappan Maruthappan wrote:
>
> +1 for separate table and view objects.
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:33 PM Russell Spitzer <
> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 to separate.
>>
>> > On Apr 25, 2024, at 2:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 to separate, it makes sense to me.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > JB
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:50 AM Walaa Eldin Moustafa
>> > <wa.moust...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi everyone,
>> >>
>> >> I would like to make a proposal for issue [1] to support materialized
>> views in Iceberg. The support leverages two separate objects, an Iceberg
>> view and an Iceberg table to implement materialized views. Each object
>> retains relevant metadata to support the MV operations. An initial design,
>> which we can refine, is detailed in the description section of this PR [2].
>> >>
>> >> This proposal is the outcome of extensive community discussions in
>> various forums [3, 4, 5, 6, 7].
>> >>
>> >> Please respond with your recommendation:
>> >> +1 if you support moving forward with the two separate objects model.
>> >> 0 if you are neutral.
>> >> -1 if you disagree with the two separate objects model.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Walaa.
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10043
>> >> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9830
>> >> [3]
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zg0wQ5bVKTckf7-K_cdwF4mlRi6sixLcyEh6jErpGYY
>> >> [4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420
>> >> [5]
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UnhldHhe3Grz8JBngwXPA6ZZord1xMedY5ukEhZYF
>> >> [6] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tb3wcs7czjvjbq9y1qtr87g9s95ky5zh
>> >> [7] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l6cvrp4r1001k08cy2ypybzy2kgxpt1y
>>
>>

Reply via email to