+1 for separate table and view objects. On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:33 PM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to separate. > > > On Apr 25, 2024, at 2:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > > +1 to separate, it makes sense to me. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:50 AM Walaa Eldin Moustafa > > <wa.moust...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> I would like to make a proposal for issue [1] to support materialized > views in Iceberg. The support leverages two separate objects, an Iceberg > view and an Iceberg table to implement materialized views. Each object > retains relevant metadata to support the MV operations. An initial design, > which we can refine, is detailed in the description section of this PR [2]. > >> > >> This proposal is the outcome of extensive community discussions in > various forums [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. > >> > >> Please respond with your recommendation: > >> +1 if you support moving forward with the two separate objects model. > >> 0 if you are neutral. > >> -1 if you disagree with the two separate objects model. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Walaa. > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10043 > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9830 > >> [3] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zg0wQ5bVKTckf7-K_cdwF4mlRi6sixLcyEh6jErpGYY > >> [4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420 > >> [5] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UnhldHhe3Grz8JBngwXPA6ZZord1xMedY5ukEhZYF > >> [6] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tb3wcs7czjvjbq9y1qtr87g9s95ky5zh > >> [7] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l6cvrp4r1001k08cy2ypybzy2kgxpt1y > >
